There's something that keeps bothering me: why don't you put on the Chikou? I'd give you more confirmation.
Printable View
There's something that keeps bothering me: why don't you put on the Chikou? I'd give you more confirmation.
The Chikou I use in other setups. Here I am only interested in the pure movement of SSA and SSB.
I tried it by adding the Chikou and it actually gives cleaner exits in prolonged trends.
Have you thought about automating just the twist alert? So we could monitor multiple pairs easier.
I'm programming that, a simple twist scanner to monitor several pairs at a time.
That would be the perfect complement to the method.
What if SSA and SSB flatten after the twist?
No, if after the twist the lines stay horizontal I discard it. I prefer turns with pronounced inclination.
It was hard for me to understand at first, not all twists are the same.
Exactly, that's why I always repeat: twist + tilt + torque context = better signal quality.
Today I had two tickets according to the system, one winner and another BE. I like your balance.
It's a system that looks for statistical probability, not guessing every move.
Do you consider the correlation between pairs to filter operations?
Yeah, if I see negative correlations between correlated pairs filter conflicting inputs.
I like that touch of extra judgment, avoid over-operating.
I am adapting the method to H4 with manual trailing. It goes very fine in trends.
In long times the Ichimoku shines. The noise is minimal and the twist is very clean.
Thank you Stonyheart, from the best Ichimoku threads I've ever read.