Originally Posted by
;
While I acknowledge a healthy skepticism about the financial claims of every trader, I also want to determine the false logic of this dogmatic skeptic. Since the dogmatic skeptic has an illusory feeling of ingrained certainty concerning subjects that they don't have knowledge about, which basically comprises everything they aren't certain of, they often resort to illogical and invalid forms of argument to attempt and warrant their illogical assertions of certainty or intense skepticism.
Example 1: The dogmatic skeptic says there is almost certainly no intelligent life from the planet. When questioned further, it turns out that the only valid evidence that could change their mind would be when they had been personally transported by a strange looking being to a distant planet and be permitted to explore it. Observations any testimony , physical evidence, indie or communiions from distance, telescope imagery argument or alternative evidence would be insufficient, regardless of whom, exactly what it is, how frequent or volumnuous, to change their view. It is plain they have a fixed view, and nothing can change it anyhow a blow to the head.
Example two: Some people uncover strong evidence of a criminal conspiracy. The dogmatic skeptic asserts the theory is implausible (they haughtily label it a conspiracy theory), since if it had been accurate, they assert, then that implies there are numerous criminals in society, which they imply is improbable, and furthermore assert that if it had been true then one or more of the conspirators could have gone into the media and acknowledged their own criminal acts (which is also unlikely), and then the media would have published these confessions (that isn't just improbable, but likely illegal).
Example 3: The dogmatic skeptic says that if someone found a high performance trading platform, then they'd immediately become a billionaire. If they aren't recorded already in the list of the wealthiest individuals on the planet, then they have not found an extremely successful trading platform. This argument is patently false on many counts.