when? Hedging is just not more costly, when orders are merged (all) and no hedged order grip over rollover time. Ist much more expansive.Originally Posted by ;
what did change? Merging was there for several decades.
Why can using two orders help cjhing the direction, its same in greatest case then 1 orders and clsoing portion of the order. Its impossibble to defend hedging. There are only two chances to use, all other you say is 100% wrong, actually:
- with hedging you have it easier to program. When you are not any good developer (or more beginner then moderate) its own gfaster and easy to programm hedging and pay with this unexpereinces the additional fees if neccesary.
- with hedging you dont need to learn basics more easy , you easy trade each order independently, rather than many orders in 1 order. So appears easy for many others, however isnt ,.netting is something you want to learn and want to know what trade is available with what goal within the trade.
I dont understand why you need defend hedging , its by math stupid, purpose, by useability not hedging is more complied and so not often used by beginners. But no advanced trader hedges. Or if he hedges he is not any advanced trader (or he need mix it before rollover time).