Where would you place the operation?

[esesyn33]

Next, I present 4 graphics: 5 15 60 4H GRANFICOS EUR/JPY with 5 EMA + 50 EMA in each.The trends are as follows: 5 * bassist 15 * bassist 60 * Alcista 4h * Alcista assuming that we want to enter a long position considering that the highest time frames are the dominant trend that we want to take advantage of, at what point would you enter long?

[resdesk72]

PFFF, the most difficult question of all!Trainee at UBS Investment Banking

[EsnTknua0311]

Buy in correction ... Patience is a virtue.

[esesyn33]

Here are the updated graphics of 5, 15 and 60 minutes.The upward trend continued successfully.5 min - 15 min

[esesyn33]

Here you have a clearer image of all the relevant graphics and the configuration.Again, we are only using 5ma with 50 Ema in all graphics.The white vertical line represents the 5/50 EMA crossing in the 4h graph.The red line represents the 5/50 EMA crossing in 15min.Where would you have entered the operation?

[esesyn33]

How about this configuration in the USD/JPY that occurred one or two days before?Again, the 5/50 EMA crossing in the 4H graph is the white vertical line in all graphics.15 Min cross 5/50 EMA is red.Here are the graphics, where would you have entered long?

[esesyn33]

How about the great configuration of the week, gentlemen?GBP/USD

[esesyn33]

To know, I have not operated with this configuration, but maybe I should do it, what do you think?Is it worth operating it?I'm honest, I've been operating live for 8 months now.Since I started, I have barely had stable results.Any suggestion?Cordial greetings, Mar Ko

[esesyn33]

Well, taking a look at the same EUR/JPY operation published before, there is a lesson to learn.Notice how the white vertical lines in all graphics show the crossing of the 5 EMA on the 50 EMA, and the slopes are all positive, except for the 5 EMA in the 15 min chart.In the 5 min graph we see a 5/50 EMA crossing indicated short, but then it crosses up as the orange line shows.Would you take that operation, considering that there might not be a setback large enough to cause the 5/50 EMA of 15min to cross in short and then long, what finally happened?

[esesyn33]

Now look at this setup in the EUR/USD, here is a good configuration, but the price did not go back enough to send the 15min

[esesyn33]

It seems that many people become obsessed with the small fluctuations of EMAS's crosses, but is it worth entering each crossing that appears?I have tried that strategy and, honestly, it does not always give the expected results.If the market is not in a strong trend, crosses can be just noise.Has anyone here had good results with this strategy?The problem with crosses is that many traders tend to make impulsive decisions based on them without considering the context.EMAS are useful, but they are not infallible.I always make sure to see other indicators and patterns before risking my capital.If you only base yourself at crossings, you run the risk of being a "signal trader" that ends up losing more than you earn.

[tdsxxu]

If you are waiting for each ema to cross you a clear entry signal, you are cheating.Cruces are just a small part of the story.The key is in the general trend and how the market reacts to those crosses.Sometimes, it is best to ignore them and wait for the price to confirm what the indicators are suggesting.That said, I understand that patience is not something that everyone has.If you do not have the discipline to wait for the right time, you will end up entering the market just because you see a cross and the price moves in the wrong address.The truth is that you cannot predict the market only with indicators;You need experience and a good understanding of what is happening in the background.

[Sakuxxa247]

There are many traders that enter the operations based exclusively at EMAS crosses, but that only reflects the lack of a deeper analysis.EMAS are just a tool, not the magical solution.If you are operating only with that, at some point it will fail you, and the market will give you a hard lesson.What really makes the difference is how you manage your risk.An EMAS crossing can be just the beginning, but it is your ability to keep your head cold and manage losses that will make you win in the long term.If you are not focused on risk management, the crosses are not going to save you.

[esesyn33]

What I notice in many traders is that they become too obsessed with the Cruces of the EMAS, when the key is in the market context.Yes, a crossing can be a signal, but if the market is in a consolidation phase, that is not strong enough to make a reliable entrance.In my experience, it is best to use crosses as a "confirmator" of the trend, not as a direct entry signal.You need to see beyond what EMAS tell you and really understand what is happening in the market at that time.Without context, crosses are just noise.

[EsuTkresqwS]

I don't know why so much debate about EMAS's crosses.Trading is not an exact science, and believing that a crossing will give you a winning entrance is a mistake.The crosses are just a small part of the technical analysis and, if you do not understand the action of the price behind them, you are on a very slippery path.If you focus only on EMAS's crosses, you will end up losing more than you earn.True traders understand that the indicators are just that: indicators.What really matters is how you interpret that data and how they align with your trading plan.

[esgruTunesges]

Most traders who follow the EMAS without really understanding how two things do: 1

[esesyn33]

I have realized that sometimes the most difficult thing is to know if a crossing is legitimate or if it is just a false signal.In some cases, the price goes back a little before following its trend, and that is when many traders lose patience.I have tried several approaches and sometimes the market simply does not respond as you expected.I would like to know how others handle the "false" crosses or when the trend does not follow.Some simply ignore small corrections, but is it worth taking those signs or better to wait confirmation?

[Krustunesr]

If you are looking for perfect crosses to enter, you are missing a large part of the game.EMAS crosses, especially in small time frames, are often false signs.Instead of obsessing with crossings, it is best to learn to read the price action.That will give you much clearer and reliable signals.The market is much more complex than just waiting for a crossing to give you the perfect entrance.If you base yourself only at crosses, you will be ignoring patterns of candles, supports, resistances and other factors that are crucial for a successful operation.

[siSoyaxdd]

EMAS crosses are useful, but only when used correctly.The biggest mistake I see is that traders use them without taking into account the general market structure.If you don't look at the broader context, you can enter an operation just because there was a crossing, and the market can move against you quickly.What many traders do not understand is that the crossing of EMAS alone is not enough.You need to confirm that crossing with other indicators or, better yet, with an evaluation of the global market trend.If you don't do that, you will be operating based on incomplete signals.

[esesyn33]

It's curious how we all talk about EMAS's crosses, but we never discuss what happens next.What is a crossing if you don't follow the movement?Sometimes, crosses only indicate a possible entry point, but the real challenge is how you manage the operation once you enter.What I mean is that many traders enter when they see a cross, but they don't know when to leave.If you do not correctly manage your operation, that crossing could be just the beginning of a bad streak.The key is not just to enter, but how you prepare to get out of profits or minimize losses.

[JttoSN61]

The problem with crosses is that they are used as an infallible signal, when in reality they are only one of many tools you should use.If you base your entire strategy at the EMAS crosses, you risk operating without taking into account the complete market context.What I recommend is to use crosses as a secondary signal, not as the main one.If everything else in the graph is aligned, then you can consider the entrance.But never forget that the crossing itself is not enough.You need more confirmations.

[saSosutes22]

What bothers me the most from EMAS's crosses is that many traders think they are making informed decisions, when they are actually following a blind sign.Cruces are just an indication that something could be happening, but they are not the only sign that you need to enter an operation.If you really want to succeed in trading, stop following blind signs.EMAS crosses are useful, but you must understand what they mean within the context of the price action.If you only follow crosses without more, you will end up losing more than you earn.

[Norroura]

It is one thing to use the EMAS to confirm the trend, a very different one is to enter the market just because they crossed.The biggest problem is that many traders believe that crosses are the Holy Grail.But they are not.Cruces are a sign that something may be happening, but they never guarantee that the market will move in the address you expect.What works for me is to wait for the market to confirm that crossing with a candle pattern or with a clear price action.If you only enter through a cross, you are risking to be part of a trap.