No I've not had a opportunity to take a look, but it's run by the same individuals and thats enough for me. I hate fox. And so what if CNBC is the cheerleader for the stock market, thats.Originally Posted by ;
No I've not had a opportunity to take a look, but it's run by the same individuals and thats enough for me. I hate fox. And so what if CNBC is the cheerleader for the stock market, thats.Originally Posted by ;
Oh I thought the notion was supposed to hear what you do not know already but because you know already that Fox that isn't worth it then Okay you do not watch. When it comes to trading, I try to remain objective particularly. Silly me.
I do not mean to argue with you, as most of us have our own views and agendas, either you agree with a single news resource or you do not. Thats all. If you are made by fox business money than so be it. I do not agree with their hatred breeding. Thats Cause they lie more than every other news souce.Originally Posted by ;
And if you cant realize that fox lies through it's teeth then you want to go back to 5th grade, Yes all news media has a political program but nobody establishes more than fox B.S
Does CNBC have an agenda? Most trading rooms (I had been in one for 2 years) have the picture on and the sound OFF. Other CNBC, than events is pure kiddie school. Hard live however.
I must say the 1 exception is the series Fast Money - after the markets close.
BTW I am not advoing Fox. All day, I listen to silence or music. As to what is available However, I do keep an open mind.
Edit: Oh I forgot I really do listen, some of the afternoon, to believe it or not NPR.
CNBC is dreadful. They're just pumpers of US equities with an entire lack of insight about any other markets when NY premarket opens. The only time I can even stand to see that channel is during the transition from Europe to NY premarket. The lack of international news from that channel is pathetic.
Bloomberg is enormously superior when it comes to global markets and news in general. TV is still not my principal source for penetration or news and I think everybody should take what they see/hear using a grain of salt. The analysts that make predictions on moves are a joke about TV and you'll see analysts if you watch long enough.
CNBC is nice to see just for approximately an hour..that's it,'cause then you will puke. . .they have this mindset of being quickly and sofistied and so, so serious, but in the long run they are a lot of average Joes....plus have you noticed how they are putting more and more attractive girls on the atmosphere? Nothing against girls, do not get me wrong, but honestly it's possible to tell that they all do is replicate what the consensu is and attempt to make it seem as though they are coming up with original and amazing theories. . .bleah !Originally Posted by ;
The majority of the men on Fast Money are the biggest jerks....they act all serious and stuff, in the end nobody understands poo poo there...
They really exchange for a living. You know things . Poo poo word that is good. Easy to spell.Originally Posted by ;
The Daily Show with John Stewart
As an example, I switched to both major financial systems to find out what is happening, or as they are known around here,'hot ladies talk economy with bald dudes,' Stewart said.
1 edit on my post though. Jon Najarian is the only person on CNBC who is worth the airtime IMO. His options insight is good and he's the one person who talks about anything more than buy and hold for the long haul.